"MONDAY CUP PAIRS", 22/09/08

Pos  Num Names                                                Total %

1     5  TANYA JERRARD & RAY CRAWFORD                         178.7  62.05
2     2  MARIAN RUDD & FRED ESCH                              177.0  61.46
3     7  LES CULVERWELL & GWYN EVANS                          171.0  59.38
4     4  STEVE JARVIS & TONY SCRACE                           167.7  58.23
5    14  SUSAN SORTERUP & MARY LAY                            153.0  53.12
6     6  DAVID S-MONTEFIORE & JULIET S-MONTEFIORE             143.0  49.65
7    13  PETRA GREEN & SHEILA MARSHALL                        141.3  49.06
8    11  BOB HERBERT & BETTY LOWE                             140.3  48.72
9     8  DOROTHY RIVERS & ANGELA BAKER                        136.7  47.47
10   10  STUART APPLEBY & GORDON PACK                         135.7  47.12
11    9  LIZ WALLIS & ROBIN THORNE                            122.3  42.47
12    1  JOHN ROBERTS & MARY BRIDGES                          119.0  41.32
13   12  JENNY HERBERT & TONY NOBLE                           116.0  40.28
14    3  JIM THORNE & GENE BARTOSZ                            114.3  39.69

Ruling made wrt Bd 13. Pairs 2 & 14 - Incorrect explanation of bid provided:
From EBU White Book 12.1.2 Assigned Adjusted scores
When a score is obtained on a board, and the TD decides it should be changed because of an infraction, he adjusts it under Law 12C2. For example, if a N/S pair defend 3H because they were misinformed, and the TD judges that if correctly informed they would bid 3NT vulnerable and make eleven tricks, then he assigns a score of +660 for N/S to both sides.

What actually occurred was:
E;1H, S;2NT (alerted and explained as Spades and another [Quantum])(Correct explanation was UNT for minors)
Since, in my opinion, this inhibited W from bidding their spades I assigned 4S+2 to EW as this is a likely result.